Sunday, September 14, 2008

assignment 1

turnitin originality report

Mind map Three reasons: 1. People do not want to change 2. Disadvantages caused by new technology make people resist new technology 3. People do not whether the technology is good or not Why 2people resist new technology In my opinion there are three main reasons that cause people's resistance to new technology. Firstly people are used to the old technologies and do not want to change. For example, the workers in the factory are familiar with the operations of the machines they work on every day. Introductions to new machines seem to be troubles to them as they have to relearn the techniques and practice to control the machines skillfully. It is humans' nature to live in a familiar environment. Many people resist new technologies due to this reason. Secondly, people have been aware of such a fact that the development of new technology costs a large amount of money and increases pollution. Nowadays' developments of technology are built in advanced technology and science level which all need money to support. We may wonder why we need to spend money developing the technology as we have already enough technology power to live a comfortable life. Engineers can understand the importance of technology development but ordinary people may not realize. Furthermore, the pollutions of air, soil, water have been severer than before. Other pollutions such as nuclear pollution can even have bad effects on people for many years. These all come from the development of the technology. For many people, they do not see the advantage of the new technology, so they are more likely to resist it. Besides the two reasons above, people's uncertainty of the new technology also causes their resistance, taking genetically modified food as an example. GM food was born with arguments from different aspects. There are there most common concerns about GM foods among people. They are environmental hazards, human health risks, and economic concerns (Deborah, 2000). It seems that GM food is still a risk. A research in 2005 shows that Americans still do not have a good knowledge of GM foods and animals and their responses suggest that they particularly feel uncomfortable with GM food (Wikipedia, n.d.). We also know the fact from a study in 2003 that quite a small number of Britons are willing 4to eat GM food and more than half of the population oppose the GM foods' being provided to the public (Wikipedia, n.d.). From the example shown above, the last reason is due to people's unfamiliarity of new technology. The reasons of people's resistance are indicated above. For engineers, it is a long way to go before removing these obstacles. References Deborah B. Whiteman 1(2000). Genetically Modified Foods: Harmful or Helpful? Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/gmfood/overview.php?SID=9jjj0n3ulfc8mfgic 8q46ppls4 Genetically modified food controversies. 3(n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies


1
4% match (student papers from 09/15/06)Submitted to Massey University
2
3% match (student papers from 09/02/08)Submitted to National University of Singapore
3
2% match (student papers from 09/04/08)Submitted to National University of Singapore
4
2% match (Internet from 04/19/08)http://en.wikipedia.org

2 comments:

jincanhappyzone said...

Yeah, i agree with you. Many people resist to new technologies because they dont bother to learn, they dont want money to be wasted;furthermore, they are doubting the uncertainties that wil come out.

Long said...

Firstly, you have a nice and clear thesis statement from which readers easily follow your ideas. And in fact, the flow of your ideas seems quite good within paragraphs as well as between paragraphs. I was impressed by your arguments in para 2 and 3. paragraph 1, however, needs to be considered. You had a good example, but lacked the supporting ideas to make your topic sentence of para 1 stronger. And in the conclusion paragraph, it seems too short and does not function well to sum up your whole essay's ideas. but anyway, you have done a good job, jing yu